Realistic, insurance-relevant challenges for high-potential technology talent.
An external talent hackathon by The Hartford India and T-Hub, designed to attract, identify and engage high-potential technology talent through realistic, insurance-relevant challenges.
Key dates will be announced soon.
Realistic problems. Controlled data. A fair field for every team.
The Hartford India is collaborating with T-Hub on an external talent hackathon designed to attract, identify and engage high-potential technology talent.
The event will use realistic, insurance-relevant challenges while protecting The Hartford's confidential information and maintaining a consistent, fair evaluation environment.
Pick one of two tracks.
Each team must select either Catastrophe Impact & Damage Intelligence or AI-Powered Risk & Business Intelligence, and may submit under only one challenge track.
Catastrophe Impact & Damage Intelligence
Build an AI-powered platform that combines catastrophe event data, geospatial intelligence, satellite/aerial imagery, location data, and visual damage assessment to rapidly identify impacted assets, estimate severity, and support claims and underwriting decisions.
Business context and required capabilities+
Catastrophe response requires rapid integration of weather, hazard, geographic, infrastructure and community data into an explainable operational picture. Public data is abundant, but formats, spatial resolution, timing and quality vary significantly. This track incorporates the Geospatial Catastrophe Impact Intelligence concept while also accommodating AI-driven damage assessment capabilities.
- Ingest public weather, disaster, hazard and catastrophe-event data.
- Normalize coordinates, geographic identifiers, spatial resolution and event timestamps.
- Generate and visualize hazard footprints and potentially affected regions.
- Integrate organizer-approved satellite or aerial imagery and associated metadata.
- Apply computer vision or multimodal methods to identify visible impact indicators and estimate relative damage severity.
- Correlate event, location, imagery, infrastructure and community-level signals.
- Track changes in event footprint and severity over time.
- Explain the data and visual signals behind each prioritization or severity assessment.
- Provide performance maps, dashboards, alerts and versioned APIs.
- Communicate imagery limitations, uncertainty, resolution, coverage and human-review requirements.
AI-Powered Risk & Business Intelligence
Build an AI-powered intelligence platform that combines structured and unstructured data to identify emerging risks, analyze relationships across entities and systems, generate actionable insights, and recommend Next Best Actions for business decision-making. Create a conversational layer so that users can conversationally ask questions to get answers.
Business context and required capabilities+
Public cyber information is fragmented across vulnerability databases, known-exploitation catalogues, vendor advisories and news. Severity alone does not indicate systemic relevance, and product names and versions are frequently inconsistent across sources. This track combines the Cyber Risk Signal & Systemic Technology Intelligence concept with the GenAI Business Intelligence Agent idea into a single, broader intelligence and decision-support theme.
- Ingest and normalize structured and unstructured data.
- Resolve vendor, product, technology and other relevant entity aliases across approved sources.
- Build and query relationships using knowledge graphs or equivalent explainable relationship models.
- Identify emerging risk signals and material changes over time.
- Analyze multi-source evidence, including conflicting or incomplete information.
- Implement retrieval-augmented generation and source-grounded natural-language generation.
- Generate actionable insights, briefs, watchlists, timelines and recommended Next Best Actions.
- Provide a conversational layer that supports business questions, follow-up questions and evidence retrieval.
- Support agentic workflows with explicit boundaries, human approval and auditable steps.
- Provide full-stack dashboards, APIs and traceable user experiences.
Engineers who like hard, real-world problems.
Priority skill areas
Guidewire and Duck Creek experience may be relevant to candidate profiles, but participants will not receive access to either platform and will not be required to build on them.
Two categories. Judged separately.
Team rules
- 01Teams must consist of 3 to 5 participants.
- 02Individual participation is not permitted.
- 03Each participant may belong to only one team, and each team may submit under only one challenge track.
- 04Each team must select either Catastrophe Impact & Damage Intelligence or AI-Powered Risk & Business Intelligence.
- 05Student and experienced professional teams will participate as separate categories. Mixed student and experienced professional teams will not be permitted.
- 06Each submission must specify the role and contribution of every team member.
- 07Team-member substitutions will not be permitted after the preliminary submission deadline except in exceptional circumstances approved by the organizers.
A multi-week virtual build followed by an in-person finale at T-Hub.
This format provides sufficient time to demonstrate meaningful engineering depth while preserving a high-energy, leadership-visible finale.
Ship it like it's going to production.
Judges look beyond the demo. Your submission package should include everything on this list.
- ✓Working prototype or demonstrable application
- ✓Source-code repository
- ✓Architecture diagram
- ✓Solution overview and technical documentation
- ✓Data-source register
- ✓List of models, APIs, libraries and third-party components
- ✓Deployment and execution instructions
- ✓Short demonstration video
- ✓Responsible AI, privacy and security considerations
- ✓Team roles and individual contribution statement
- ✓Known assumptions, limitations and failure conditions
Two stages, one standard.
Technical screening
T-Hub will first complete eligibility and submission-completeness checks. Eligible submissions will then be reviewed by at least two evaluators using a standardized scoring sheet. 3-5 teams will qualify for the final round.
In-person finale
- Solution presentation and live demonstration
- Technical and business question-and-answer session
- Controlled hidden dataset or scenario
- Architecture and targeted code review
- Assessment of each team member's contribution and understanding
The judging panel's decision will be final.
More than a leaderboard.
Ready to build?
Form a team of 3 to 5, pick your track and get ready. Registration details and key dates will be announced soon.
Registration opens soon